Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Population Control?

It is always a bit depressing to read about people whose work has been wholly discredited again and again, and yet they keep getting jobs, money, influence, invitations to conferences and prizes. Why? 

In 1968, in "The Population Time Bomb", Paul Ehrlich wrote that Earth had exceeded its capacity and "in the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will die of hunger". This didn't happen, of course, not even close, but the man is still alive and promoting the same ideas and has been invited to important events (he even met Pope Francis a few years ago) and has gathered an impressive collection of prizes. 

Another name that keeps popping is Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the economic pillage of Russia with the "shock therapy" doctrine in the 1990s. Despite being wrong again and again, he keeps being invited to conferences and getting tons of money. Jeffrey, of course, is also on the "population control" bandwagon. And many others like him. 

So I can't blame those who think that the current mRNA vaccines are a tool for "population control" or better said, population reduction. Because this idea is deeply entrenched in many of the thinkers and entrepreneurs loved by the current powers that be - including Bill Gates, of course, who also seems obsessed with both vaccines and overpopulation. 

Now, I don't think that this particular Covid vaccine might be the one to do it. It might not even be very dangerous, at least in the short term. But perhaps this is just a test-run for another vaccine that will cause sterility later on. Who knows? 

Already in the 1970s, the creator of the polio vaccine, Jonas Salk, was writing in his book "Survival of the Wisest" about his idea of using DNA-altering vaccines to reduce global population. So it's not something new. Controlling reproduction and the human body is one of the major obsessions of trans-humanists. 




Corona is a lie

It seems that there are mainly two ways of seeing the corona or COVID-19 phenomenon, or at least that's how people behave: either there is a serious global pandemic and the vaccination of millions is the only solution, or it's all a lie, the virus doesn't exist and the vaccine will is a tool for depopulation. 

I personally tend more towards the "lie" line, of course, but I am not as radical. In a way, I would situate myself in a middle of the road line: i.e. there is a disease (perhaps eve created in a lab, as we know there was a lab studying and enhancing bat coronaviruses in or near Wuhan), but it is not as deadly or contagious as it is said, and surely does not require the unprecedented measures taken of a global "lockdown". 

In fact, recent studies such as the recent one by J. A. Ioannidis show that the lockdown had little effect in containing the spread of the disease in most countries, so its major consequence was social and economic, but affected little health. And in fact if you compare countries or U.S. States that did hard lockdowns with those that didn't, the number of cases varies. There is no correlation between lockdown and reduction in deaths or cases. The only thing that seems to help is time. 

So the whole lockdown and masks, besides the growing authoritarian controls such as tracking people, forcing tests, in the future forcing vaccination, has another motive than the "pandemic". 

Indeed, if you think about it, what did the Powers That Be (current Western Governments, Wall Street, Big Tech, Big Pharma and Big Media) want or were pushing for these last years? Digital currency (to track everything), surveillance technology (to track your location at all times and get all your data, even about your health, or personal), more vaccines (a huge profit), genetic and/or technological modification of humans (transhumanism, mRNA hacking), social atomization and people staying home watching digital entertainment instead of outside. 

So in what way would things be different without corona? Corona was a Godsend, or should I say a Devilsend to them, as it just helped to accelerate all the dreams of control that they already had - and if you don't believe it, check "The Great Reset" by Klaus Schwab from the WEF that states the same thing. 

So of course I am skeptical of the whole COVID thing. As for the vaccines, I don't think they are a depopulation tool, and perhaps not even that dangerous (now). What they are, instead, besides a huge profit, is a massive test for the new mRNA technology that is planned to be used not just for vaccines, but to hijack our cells to produce all kinds of things. They've been doing this with chickens and cows for years now, so why not do it to humans? At least, that's what they think. 

Right now things are dying down a bit, but I wouldn't that masks and lockdowns will be gone yet. Also, if "vaccine passports" become a reality, it will be much worse, creating two types of citizens with different rights, the "vaccinated" and the "unvaccinated". 

But we will see... 



Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Corona regulations going on

The "corona" phenomenon is still going on, and there seems to be no end in sight. Now Italy and Germany are again considering restrictions, which will certainly hurt the economy even more. 

It is not very clear that "corona" is much more of a menace than a regular influenza, and even if it is, if such hypothetical danger really needed a complete lockdown that destroyed many livelihoods and in some cases created loneliness and despair. 

I think that, strange at it may seem, Sweden took the right approach in letting its own citizens decide how to react. It is not up to the state (or should not be) to control people's movement and basically make them prisoners in their own homes, for reasons that are not still very clear. 

There is a lot of contradictory information about this pandemic, we will post other news and information about it soon. But we tend to be skeptical of the mainstream view. 

Just for starters, check out what the World Economic Forum is planning ("the Great Reset") as well as the Gates Foundation and others pushing for a "RNA vaccine", which could be dangerous and has not been fully tested. Do you want to be a lab rat? I don't.